In 2024, Subin Mitra’s fashion supply chain startup faced a brutal reckoning. After posting explosive growth to ₹492 crores, the kind of hockey-stick numbers that make for great pitch decks, the business was bleeding. The company was spending ₹1.24 to earn every rupee. Losses had climbed to ₹74 crores. The B2B trading business fueling the growth was burning capital with no path to profitability.

Most founders would have raised another round and kept the party going. Subin did the opposite. He killed the growth engine, cut his team from 254 to 97, and rebuilt Groyyo around a single principle: unit economics matter more than top-line revenue.

Today, Groyyo runs at a ₹600 crore annual run rate with 6% EBITDA margins and projects ₹25 crore profit for FY26. The company still has over 50% of the capital it raised in the bank. It’s a rare story in Indian startups of survival through discipline.

Check out the video of the conversation here or read on for insights

From Bain to the Factory Floor

Subin’s path to manufacturing wasn’t traditional. At 19, he landed at Bain & Company’s Private Equity Group, learning to dissect businesses through an investor’s lens. But the real education came at Zilingo, the B2B fashion marketplace that raised over $300 million before collapsing amid fraud allegations.

He watched the playbook for “growth at all costs” up close, and it left a mark.

Within the first year itself, I could see that this is not a real business. They were buying at 100 and selling at 90 rupees. I was like, how are you ever going to make money out of that? I think they were burning close to 80, 90 crores a month.

The contrast between investor theater and actual business building was stark. At Zilingo, investor visits meant photo shoots and fanfare. Buyer visits meant nothing. That front-row seat to failure became Subin’s most valuable training.

When he co-founded Groyyo in July 2021, the mission was clear: build an export-focused platform connecting India’s 20 million small manufacturers with global brands, but do it profitably from day one.

The Contrarian Bet on Small Factories

The conventional wisdom in Indian manufacturing is to work with the giants like Shahi Exports and Gokuldas. Subin went the other direction. He bet on the long tail, the thousands of small factories in Tirupur, Noida, and Dhaka operating at 50-60% capacity, unable to meet global compliance standards.

The insight was counterintuitive: in fashion manufacturing, scale doesn’t reduce costs the way it does in other industries.

If you think of the manufacturing process, scale costs come down when you have a line assembly process. But in fashion, every order will have 15, 20 SKUs. So it is actually the lower guy who has a cost advantage. The bigger guy will actually do the same thing but with a higher cost structure.

Fast fashion’s shift toward smaller batches and faster turnarounds played directly into the strengths of these smaller factories. They just lacked everything else: compliance systems, quality controls, design capabilities, and access to buyers.

Groyyo’s solution wasn’t a simple marketplace. It was to upgrade the supply side first through an integrated model: the Groyyo+ app for digitizing factory operations, consulting services to implement lean manufacturing, and an in-house design studio. Early results showed 15% reduction in production lead times, 15% drop in defect rates, and 5% capacity increases without new capital expenditure.

The clarity of this vision impressed early investors. Alpha Wave led a $4.6 million seed round in September 2021 when Groyyo was doing just ₹25 lakh in monthly revenue. By June 2022, Tiger Global had poured in $40 million.

The Near-Death Experience

Then came the misstep. Flush with capital in a frothy market, Groyyo expanded into low-margin domestic B2B trading. The business model was fundamentally flawed: capital-intensive, low margins, growing receivables. By FY24, revenue declined 14.4% to ₹421 crores even as losses climbed.

The pivot was surgical and painful. Groyyo shut down the entire trading business, laid off over 150 people, and refocused 100% on high-margin exports. Internal guardrails went up: no order below 20% gross margin, no exceptions.

The company has now completely re-oriented its business strategy to focus only on high-margin exports. This has enabled us to transition to a 20%+ take rate business while also hitting EBITDA profitability in FY25.

The take rate jumped from around 10% to 28-30%, far higher than typical B2B marketplaces. This was only possible because of the integrated services that made Groyyo indispensable rather than interchangeable.

Farming, Not Hunting

Groyyo today serves over 46 customers across nine countries, including Next, Mango, Inditex (Zara’s parent company), and Ross. Over 90% of production goes to exports. The company connects 500+ MSME factories and still captures only 1-2% share of wallet from most clients.

The math on that is striking. Getting to 7-8% share of wallet with the existing 50 top customers alone would drive revenue to ₹6,500 crores in five years, without adding a single new client.

We very actively think that if we can just keep becoming larger for these customers, we will create a very large business. So why put so much bandwidth in getting 50 more customers? Might as well nurture these and scale up.

The strategy is deliberate. Every 14 days, Groyyo’s design studio curates new collections customized for each customer and category. Teams travel with suitcases full of samples to London and New York, laying them across conference tables.

The team structure reflects this philosophy. Zero generalists except Subin and the CFO. Every role filled by 20+ year industry veterans poached from legacy exporters. Average management team age: 45+.

Apart from me and our finance team, our org has zero generalists. Everyone in every team are people who come with a lot of experience doing that. We poached people from large legacy export houses who have been working with these kinds of customers who understand their language.

It’s the opposite of the typical startup playbook, but it works in an industry where relationships and technical expertise can’t be faked.

What Comes Next

Groyyo is expanding into Sri Lanka, Vietnam, and Indonesia, riding the gradual shift of manufacturing away from China. US tariffs now sit at 50%, but Groyyo’s exposure is limited. Just 10% of revenue comes from the US market, with the bulk in UK and Europe.

The company is in talks for a $40 million round at a $200 million valuation, but there’s no urgency. Cash flow positive and sitting on half the capital ever raised, Groyyo can choose its investors rather than need them.

But the real lesson from Groyyo isn’t about technology or geopolitics. It’s about a 27-year-old founder who learned the hardest lesson in venture-backed startups: sometimes the bravest thing you can do is stop growing, fix what’s broken, and build a business that actually works.

Unit economics from day zero have to make sense. Every company exists to create value for all stakeholders. That dhanda mindset needs to be there. How are you going to fundamentally make money on revenue and on margins?

In an ecosystem that still celebrates valuation over value, Groyyo’s story stands out. Not because it’s scaling faster than anyone else, but because it’s building something that might actually last.

Listen now!

Other ways to listen:

Apple Podcast | Amazon Music

Your Feedback matters

As always, I’d love to hear your thoughts! Whether it’s about this episode or ideas you’ve been playing around with, shoot me an email at ad@thepodium.in. Your feedback keeps these conversations going, and I’m always up for chatting about your startup ideas too.

Until next time,

Your Host,

Akshay Datt

The Founder Thesis Podcast | Learn from disruptive founders

How Subin Mitra Built Groyyo Into India's…